Wednesday, June 5, 2019

Dangers of Using Cell Phones while Driving

Dangers of Using Cell Phones while DrivingMichael D. Stripling principleThe rate at which bridle-path carnages argon reported dumbfound join ond significantly curiously within the 21st century. numerous commonwealth have been mixed in disasters because of recklessness and inattentiveness in the roads as motorists. Statistics on these establishments creates the need of effective address in the first place further harm and deaths are experienced. M both facial expressions in life have contributed recklessness relative to knell use by motorists. Theories relative to multitasking, movies, and ideologies devised by electric mobile phone phone companies are among major contributors to phone use in cars.The young members of society bare the harm of using phones in cars because of misinformation, lack of information or ignorance to road safety measures. The youth are among the population most affected by road carnages and effects. There is need to give information to the youth on the dangers of using jail cell phones in cars before they engage in whimsical lessons and eventually drive. The information to the young plurality is important as it would help inculcate good cultures in driving and universe considerate while on roads.The significance of the dangers of using cell phones by motorist is addressing recklessness that contributes to the death of road users through unjustified musical modes. Through addressing such(prenominal) an issue the importance of road safety will be illuminated. Road carnages have been for long related to vices like drinking and the use of drugs that interfere with cognitive abilities while on the road. This aspect will contribute an understanding of the relationship between using cell phones and using drugs while driving. Therefore, the presentation seeks to enable haughty contribution in saving humanity through knowledge on ways to reduce and prevent road accidents.Outline of the PresentationIntroductionThe changes that h ave been experienced in the modern society prompting the need for the constant use of cell phonesThe oblivious nature and ignorance involving drivers of the dangers on road ways.The use of cell phone on own and separate rafts livesInsurance Institute of Highway safety stipulates in high spiritser chances of motorist indulging car accident based on two reasons.The motorists have to divert attention to the phones interface.The motorist gets immersed in the conversation and attention is limited.According to Virginia Tech superman Institute and National Highway Traffic Safety.Use of hand-free phones are dangerous compared to hand held phones while drivingThe absolve of not holding phones while driving to void accidents is unjustified.Motorists that use hand-free phones while driving are 18% slower when braking.This stipulates that multitasking is an inconsiderate myth while driving in major roads.Young spate are mostly oblivious of the recklessness and are involved in car acciden ts unjustifiably.ConclusionCell phones contribute positively and immensely to peoples lives.There is need for care to avoid unjustifiable death on the roads.IntroductionThe modern society comprises of businessmen, students, lawyers, doctors and people of different occupations. These people have to view that they are constantly connected to clients, family and other people of significance in their lives. The popularity of cell phones has ensured a constant connection and updates in the lives of such people. However, most people tend to indulge in the wrong use of cell phones. This is because some people are either forgetful, oblivious or ignorant of the dangers of using cell phones while driving. The chart above stipulates how drastic accident levels are among the young people in the United States of America which have highest cell phones popularity and usage. The popularity of cell phones has contributed to a culture which is costly to the society based on the number of deaths on r oads because of recklessness. Regardless of the urgency of a call, it is not justified to put other peoples lives at risk because of own neglect and perceptions. The prohibition of using cell phones while driving is based on the imminent threats to people lives.According to the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety, motorists are four times likely to get injured while driving and using their cell phones (Violanti Marshall, 1996). The high possibility of indulging in a car accident while using of cell phones is based on two factors. While dialing, most people have to look at the phone interface. This establishes a distraction from the incoming vehicles or objects, which increases the risk to crashing into an oncoming car or object. Another evident aspect that transpires in the use of cell phones is that people can be absorbed in the cell phone conversation to the extent that their thinking is impaired. This effect is convertible to driving while drunk as the driver is not within pr oper reasonableness to make decisions while on the road.According to the Virginia Tech passage Institute and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the use of hand-free phones is also dangerous compared to hand held phones (Rosenboom, 2006). In a study conducted in 2004, the motorists that apply transfer free phones have to redial approximately 40% of the time compared to the hand held phones by motorists (Rosenboom, 2006). This postulates the unjustified arguments which most people tend to engage as the excuse to use cell phones while driving. According to this research, the use of hand-free phones by motorists is more dangerous compared to the hand held phones.In the cases of near accident experiences, motorists that are on hands free phones are 18% slower in braking compared to those using hand-held phones (Lamble, et al, 1999). This statistic is similar to that of a person driving while intoxicated. These statistics support the ideology that is organise against the conventional knowledge of multitasking. Multitasking is a simple myth which does not suffice on the dangerous roads as truth or wisdom. Talking and driving are both activities that require attention. Therefore, performing both tasks at the same time is subjecting the brain to impossibilities and endangering other road users lives. The culture has grown popular especially among the youth who make statistics as they also suffer from road carnages due to recklessness.ConclusionCell phones are vital gadgets to peoples lives especially in the 21st century where people have the need to be connected constantly. However, despite the convenience they offer, people have to consider the relative negative attributes. In the United States, it is reported that 6.4% of all crashes are because of inattentive driving (Strayer, Et al, 2003).Driving on any road, especially highways, is a matter that should not be taken lightly. This is because many peoples lives including unaware bystande rs are dependent on the attentive level of motorist. Responsibility on the roads is a matter that requires the strictest rules against offenders to avoid road carnages.Potential QuestionsQ What are the best and most effective policies that can be implemented during cell phone usage in cars to reduce road accidents?A Yes, more comprehensive driver education and technology and just 2 ways to improve driver safety.Q The multitasking myth is commonly associated to females, in that locationfore, are there narrower statistics of cell phones and car accidents relative to victims sex?A There is no conclusive data to suggest that female drivers are any more likely to have an accident than males due to multitasking.Q Is the level of road accidents set to get higher in the coming future and if so, what is the best way of creating awareness at both national and international levels?A As the population increases in the coming decades, it is logical to say that road accidents will increase propo rtionally. One possible way to create awareness is a national campaign akin to the DARE drug awareness program of the 90s.ReferencesLamble, D., Kauranen, T., Laakso, M., Summala, H. (1999). cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving.Accident Analysis Prevention,31(6), 617-623.Rosenbloom, T. (2006). Driving performance while using cell phones an observational study.Journal of Safety Research,37(2), 207-212.Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving.Journal of experimental psychology Applied,9(1), 23.Violanti, J. M., Marshall, J. R. (1996). Cellular phones and traffic accidents an epidemiological approach.Accident Analysis Prevention,28(2),

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.